A visual representation of the conflict between science and disinformation.

Science is under siege from weaponised disinformation – posing a threat to human civilisation | AI News Digest

Published: September 10, 2025, 8:08 p.m. Science Negative

Author: AI News Digest Editorial Team
Publisher: AI News Digest
Original report: The Guardian

The article discusses the growing threat of weaponised disinformation against science, particularly in the context of climate change and public health, comparing the responses of Australia and the US. It highlights the influence of various actors, including media and political entities, in spreading antiscience narratives. The authors argue that Australia has chosen a path that respects science, unlike the US, which has seen a rise in antiscience sentiment. The article calls for action against the disinformation machine that undermines scientific understanding and policymaking.

disinformationscienceclimate changepublic healthAustraliaUS

The Five Ps of Antiscience

The article identifies five primary forces behind the assault on science, termed the 'five Ps': plutocrats, petrostates, pros (paid promoters of anti-science), propagandists, and the media. These entities work together to create a disinformation environment that undermines public trust in scientific consensus. Their collective efforts have resulted in a significant challenge for societies trying to address critical issues like climate change and public health. Understanding these forces is essential for developing effective countermeasures.

Comparative Electoral Systems

The article contrasts the electoral systems of Australia and the US, highlighting how Australia's compulsory voting and preferential voting contribute to more representative governance. In contrast, the US faces challenges such as gerrymandering and low voter turnout, which distort electoral outcomes. These systemic differences have allowed Australia to elect a government that acknowledges climate change as a threat, while the US has seen a rise in antiscience sentiment. This comparison underscores the importance of electoral reform in addressing public policy issues.

Media Influence on Public Perception

The role of media, particularly the Murdoch empire, is critically examined in the article as a major contributor to the spread of disinformation. The authors argue that media outlets like Fox News have played a significant role in promoting climate and Covid-19 skepticism. This influence has serious implications for public perception and policy decisions regarding science. The need for media diversity and accountability is emphasized as a crucial step in combating the spread of antiscience narratives.