Attorney Penalized for Using AI in Court Filings and Justifications | AI News Digest
In a significant development within the legal community, attorney Michael Fourte is under fire following a recent case in the New York Supreme Court for incorporating artificial intelligence into his legal submissions. Court records indicate that Fourte filed a brief that included AI-generated citations and quotes, which were later found to be fabricated or "hallucinated." The controversy intensified when he added more AI-generated material while defending his original use of the technology in response to a sanctions motion from opposing counsel. Judge Joel Cohen lambasted Fourte for depending on unverified AI sources, underscoring the dangers posed by insufficient oversight in legal practices. This incident prompts critical discussions regarding the ethical implications of AI in law and the potential ramifications for attorneys who utilize such technology without thorough verification.
Read more...
